Former Service Members and Journalists Call for Transparent UAP Disclosure and Stronger Witness Protections at a Congressional Panel
To the point
Jeffrey Nusatelli, Alexandro Wiggins, Dylan Borland, and investigative journalist George Knapp testified to Congress about unidentified aerial phenomena, saying stigma, fear, and retaliation silence witnesses, sharing incidents at Vandenberg (2003–2005), off Southern California (2023), and Langley (2012), and urging independent research, declassification, and stronger whistleblower protections for a transparent, evidence‑based, bipartisan path to disclosure.
A group of former service members and journalists testified before a congressional panel about unidentified aerial phenomena, arguing that stigma, fear, and retaliation have silenced witnesses and hindered truth-seeking. Jeffrey Nusatelli, a former USAF military police officer, recounted UAP incursions at Vandenberg Air Force Base from 2003 to 2005, including the Red Square, a massive silent triangular craft, and a 30-foot sphere of light above his backyard, all witnessed and investigated but not adequately guided by officials. Navy operations specialist Alexandro Wiggins described a 2023 incident off Southern California with four self-luminous tic-tac objects that moved in unison and departed with extraordinary acceleration, urging better data capture, declassification, and witness protection. Dylan Borland, a geospatial intelligence specialist, detailed a 2012 Langley sighting of a triangular craft and said his career was thwarted by exposure to classified UAP programs, highlighting retaliation within the intelligence community. Investigative journalist George Knapp highlighted FOIA-driven documents and alleged Soviet-era programs suggesting official acknowledgement of real phenomena and possible crash retrieval and reverse engineering, including connections to OSAP and Thread 3. The witnesses pressed three goals: fund independent UAP research, end secrecy and overclassification, and protect those who come forward from retaliation, arguing that transparency would bolster public trust and safety. They criticized Arrow for reportedly dismissing or mischaracterizing witnesses and urged Congress to safeguard whistleblowers and expand protections against retaliation under a robust disclosure framework. Across accounts, videos and sensor data are cited as compelling but not conclusive proof, leaving open questions about whether phenomena are terrestrial, foreign, or non-human, and underscoring the need for a careful, evidence-driven path to disclosure. The overarching call is for a sustained, bipartisan effort to normalise reporting, preserve data, and pursue transparent, independent analysis of these extraordinary encounters.
Source: youtube.com