Alleged Coordinated Disinformation Targeting UAP Witnesses Involving ODNI and Legacy Program Security
To the point
Allegations claim current and former service members with clearances used government time and computers to run a coordinated disinformation and psychological operations campaign against UAP witnesses tied to legacy security, supposedly to destroy rather than protect them, and after the September 2025 UAP hearing Matthew Brown was invited to an ODNI event under Tulsi Gabbard’s DIG initiative that offered no whistleblower protection and raised questions about his credibility, a pattern echoed by earlier witnesses who reported phone hacks, with Brown pointing to a central coordinator tied to legacy security and a DARPA deputy at Northrop Grumman plus a list of 42 related names but no ODNI reply, leading Brown and fellow whistleblower Dylan Borland to launch a nonprofit to pursue disclosure in court and use what they call lawfare to protect whistleblowers, while framing ongoing harassment as more than online trolling and suggesting that genuine accountability or official disclosure will not come from existing channels.
Allegations have emerged that active‑duty and reserve service members with current clearances are running coordinated disinformation and psychological operations against UAP witnesses on government time and from government computers, with ties to legacy program security. A source claimed the nation’s top intelligence body conducted an operation not to protect witnesses but to destroy them, and Matthew Brown’s account details a direct escalation. After the September 2025 congressional UAP hearing, Brown was invited to Liberty Crossing by the ODNI under Tulsi Gabbard’s DIG initiative, but the meeting reportedly offered no whistleblower protection and instead raised questions about his credibility, a pattern echoed by prior witnesses who reported phone hacks at similar gatherings. Brown alleges the true purpose was to gather material to discredit him and others rather than shield them, framing a broader effort to suppress disclosure. The ODNI allegedly issued three characterizations against Brown—fabricating the discovery, acting as a counterintelligence threat, and anti‑Semitic views—based on concerns about his reaction to the October 7th attack on Israel, which he disputes. He pointed to a central coordinator connected to legacy program security, a deputy SAPCO for DARPA at Northrop Grumman, and a documented list of 42 related names, yet received no response from the ODNI. In response, Brown and fellow whistleblower Dylan Borland launched a nonprofit to pursue disclosure through the courts, aiming to light a system on fire with lawfare while also protecting whistleblowers. The episode frames ongoing harassment as more than online trolling, describing a sustained effort to intimidate witnesses and their families, and casts doubt on whether genuine accountability or official disclosure will come from existing channels.
Source: youtube.com