Bipartisan Push for Full Declassification of UAP Intelligence and the UAP Disclosure Act, Establishing a Presidential Panel to Guide Disclosure
To the point
Led by Danny Sheen, a bipartisan push seeks full declassification of all UAP intelligence to determine if any craft originate beyond Earth, and would create a nine‑person presidential panel plus a seven‑year controlled disclosure to guide society through a potential paradigm shift, backed by whistleblowers and evidence such as recovered nonhuman craft and DNA‑tested bodies and the Tic Tac footage, while acknowledging secret programs and patent concerns and arguing the disclosures could reshape science, economics, and geopolitics, with stronger whistleblower protections ahead of upcoming hearings.
A bipartisan push seeks full declassification of all classified intelligence on unidentified aerial phenomena and whether any originate from beyond Earth, criticizing the Defense Department and CIA for withholding and mischaracterizing information. Danny Sheen, a civil rights attorney and founder of the New Paradigm Institute, represents whistleblowers and champions the UAP Disclosure Act, which would require immediate public release of information older than 25 years and create a nine‑person presidential panel plus a seven‑year controlled disclosure campaign to guide society through the potential paradigm shift. The proposal argues that the panel will determine what to release next and that the disclosure process would help adjust economics, geopolitics, and science to the reality of an extraterrestrial presence. The whistleblowers allegedly describe evidence including recovered nonhuman spacecraft and bodies DNA-tested as nonhuman, though public details remain incomplete. Visual material, such as the Tic Tac footage captured by F-18 gun cameras showing rapid, gravity‑defying maneuvers, is cited as part of the body of observed phenomena. The discussion acknowledges possibilities of secret defense programs and backengineering by contractors, but also asserts that many craft are not Earth-origin, with concerns about patenting and commercialization. The timeline suggested runs from sightings around the 1945 atomic era, with a 1947 crash retrieval, and raises questions about propulsion that challenges conventional physics. Skeptics are acknowledged, yet proponents argue that testimonial and video evidence will compel reconsideration of established physics, while stressing the need for enhanced whistleblower protections as hearings approach. The conversation also weighs humanity’s readiness for disclosure, the potential societal and scientific upheavals, and the pursuit of witnesses who could testify under oath in forthcoming hearings.
Source: youtube.com