Reverse-Engineering Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Is NP-Complete Under Classical Computation

To the point

Karim Daghbouche argues that reverse engineering UAPs is computationally intractable under classical models—essentially NP-complete and possibly PSPACE-hard—because attempting to infer their inner mechanisms from fragmentary data with no unifying theory is prohibitively difficult.

Computational Complexity of UAP Reverse Engineering: A Formal Analysis of Automaton Identification and Data Complexity
arxiv.org

Computational Complexity of UAP Reverse Engineering: A Formal Analysis of Automaton Identification and Data Complexity

This white paper demonstrates that reverse engineering Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) is NP-complete under classical computational paradigms. By modeling UAP reconstruction as an automaton identification problem with a state characterization matrix M(D, T, E) and examining the inherent challenges in data gathering as well as unknown physics, we show that inferring internal mechanisms (such as Isotopically-Engineered-Materials or unconventional propulsion systems) from finite observational data is computationally intractable. Data D, comprising both operational non-reproducible observations and reproducible analysis data from purported crash retrievals, remains inherently fragmentary. Even if UAP observables were reproducible, the absence of a comprehensive theoretical framework ensures that reverse engineering remains NP-complete, and may escalate to PSPACE-hard or to an Entscheidungsproblem. This intractability challenges current UAP reverse engineering efforts and has profound implications for transparency on UAP technology and related venture investments. Hence, UAP are as analogous to modern smartphones in the hands of Neanderthals.