UFOs, Secrecy, and Consciousness: A Candid Discussion on Disclosure, Media, and Mind
- A participant in the UFO community describes being drawn into a very small, private chat group where over about 18 months a story emerges: an object, planet-sized, is entering or approaching the solar system from outside, decelerating for years, and expected to arrive around 2027. The object is said to be intelligent and potentially enormous; at one point a photograph is shown. He is told not to discuss it publicly. He remains cautious and skeptical, noting that a planet-sized object would have detectable effects if true, though mass vs. size and detectability are unclear. - The conversation then touches on the guest’s acting career highlights (a Superman-related project and residuals), the craft and cost of superhero costumes, and reflections on how media handles UFOs and public mystery. There is a broader thread about how insider information and secrecy affect trust within the UFO community. - Moving to the topic of government disclosure and public statements by politicians, the hosts discuss Obama’s casual remarks about aliens, Trump’s later comments and social posts advocating disclosure, and the difficulty of making credible, verifiable disclosures. They stress that even if disclosures occur, they might be gradual and require independent, scientific validation; videos and testimonies alone are unlikely to convince the public. - The dialogue shifts to AI and media reliability, noting that AI-generated UFO content can be indistinguishable from real footage, complicating the search for authentic evidence. This leads to a call for credible scientific testing and transparent data from researchers and institutions. - Personal exploration of psionics, meditation, and consciousness features prominently. The guest describes exploring readings from Upsite, remote viewing experiences, and meditation exercises that yielded intriguing but not definitive results (e.g., a symbolic image of a Confederate general that later aligned with a historical reference). Episodes with other practitioners (ghost-hunting, psi researchers, and psychics) are discussed, acknowledging both valid-looking data points and deceptive or inconclusive results. - The broader philosophical thread centers on whether the UFO phenomenon is linked to consciousness. The participants discuss theories that reality may be deeply connected to awareness (Tom Campbell’s “big toe” model, Jung’s ideas of the collective unconscious), and whether the phenomena might be partly or wholly constructed by the mind, partially non-physical, or a hybrid of physical and non-physical elements. They consider near-death experiences, telepathy, and related experiences as potentially connected. - They debate whether the phenomenon’s true nature could require a paradigm shift beyond current science, with possibilities ranging from consciousness as a fundamental substrate to models of reality that transcend conventional physics. The idea is that ongoing mystery and open-ended inquiry are essential to progress, rather than definitive answers. - The discussion also covers the motivation and integrity of sources in the field, highlighting concerns about “useful idiots,” misinformation, and the difficulty of distinguishing genuine disclosures from expedient sensationalism. There is a shared suspicion that many whistleblowers have agendas, but a minority may hold truthful insights. - The guest describes his ongoing documentary work on psionics, his interest in the mind-consciousness interface, and his personal experiments (e.g., meditation, remote viewing, psychonaut-like activities). He emphasizes a preference for collaborative, open inquiry over siloed secrets, aiming to move humanity’s understanding forward even amid uncertainty. - The conversation closes with personal updates and promotional notes: the guest mentions appearances and a recent children’s book, as well as his Substack where he frequently posts about UFOs and related topics. A listener message expresses gratitude for the guest’s authenticity and impact.
Source: youtube.com
