Sensor Gaps and Secrecy: The No-Evidence Dilemma in Anomalous-Phenomena Classification

To the point

Secrecy and sensor limits turn "no evidence" into a deliberate output rather than a claim about reality, because data is withheld and measurements are incomplete, so we must separate calibration data, professional observation, and hearsay and treat convergent reports from Fravor, Graves, and others as data to be evaluated rather than proof of aliens.

Why the UAP No Evidence Claim Proves Nothing
spicanews.com

Why the UAP No Evidence Claim Proves Nothing

The government says there is no evidence that UAP are anything unusual. By its own written admission it locks up inconclusive imagery because of the sensor that filmed it, over-classifies at a documented ninety-percent rate, and withholds the calibrated data that could settle the question. No evidence describes a filing system, not the sky.