Astrophysicist to Lead White House–Backed UAP Science Advisory Council Focused on Instrumented Study of Phenomena
To the point
A new UAP science advisory council of about a dozen scientists, including Tim Galedet and Arrow Director John Kosloski, formed at the request of the White House, Arrow, the ODNI, the FBI, and the broader intelligence community, will systematically study unidentified phenomena by lab-testing physical samples, running raw data through AI tools, and examining how witnesses report events to build a data-driven, instrumented understanding rather than rely on anecdotes, with policy debates on disclosure and public input shaping how findings are shared.
Christina Gomez reports that an astrophysicist has been tapped to head a new UAP science advisory council formed at the request of the White House, Arrow, the ODNI, the FBI, and the broader intelligence community. The panel, described as a balanced team of roughly a dozen scientists, will test physical samples in the lab, run raw data through AI tools, and study why witnesses report what they report, uniting hardware, numbers, and human perception in one effort. Retired Navy Rear Admiral Tim Galedet, an oceanographer who previously led NOAA, is among its members, signaling interest in transmedium activity that includes the oceans. The council’s work is rooted in gathering higher-quality data and moving beyond rehashing old, unverifiable cases; a June 5, 2026 memo signed by Arrow Director John Kosloski chronicles an October 2023 incident near a secure Western site with orange and red orbs and other phenomena, noting about 40% of sightings are unexplained and 60% are accounted for by radar or flight logs. The same batch cites a 2008 Zimbabwe sighting over Herrera Airport with radar and optical beams. Discussion around the UAP Disclosure Act persists, with proponents arguing it would force records open by law even if future administrations differ, while some material remains governed by agency-specific laws, slowing release. David Grush has claimed photographic evidence of various craft shapes and expects further disclosures, and Chris Mellon notes ongoing White House pressure to release more data, though CIA and DOE involvement remains uneven for legal and procedural reasons. The core takeaway is that the council aims to provide a methodical, instrumented path to study objects rather than merely collecting anecdotes, urging focus on the objects themselves and inviting public input on whether scientific leadership enhances trust or merely signals timing questions.
Source: youtube.com