Loeb Forms UAP Science Advisory Panel Under Scrutiny for Transparency and Inclusion

Two notable developments in the UAP space were highlighted: Harvard professor Avi Loeb announced that he has been tasked by White House agencies to assemble a science advisory council on UAPs and named an initial A‑team of researchers, with a fuller roster circulated afterward. He shared the list on YouTube, but no public confirmation from the White House has followed, and the process appears to be moving ahead with limited transparency. A central point of contention is the inclusion of Michael Shermer, whose recent social media remarks about David Grusch and Heaven’s Gate are argued to undermine the panel’s credibility and optics. Other nominees are discussed, with some seen as promising—such as Segall and Knuth—while questions are raised that Nolan might have been a stronger leader and the overall selection process warrants scrutiny. The critic also questions why Loeb’s reporting on UAPs has shifted in recent months and flags a possible collaboration with Arrow as a red flag needing clarification. The takeaway is that pursuing high‑quality data matters, but questions of objectivity, transparency, and optics surround the formation of the panel. Viewers are invited to share their thoughts on the lineup, especially regarding the balance between skepticism and openness in a field where credible government–science collaboration is still evolving. In this tension, the hope remains that rigorous research from researchers like Segall and Knuth can help advance understanding of UAPs while calls for accountability around inclusions persist.

Source: youtube.com