From UFO to UAP: A Data-Driven Tri-Domain Framework and the U.S. Shift toward Scientific Study of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena

To the point

A shift from calling mysterious objects UFOs to UAPs reflects a structured, cross‑domain, data‑driven effort led by All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office head Jon T. Kosloski to study unidentified airborne, transmedium, and submerged objects using five observable clues to distinguish real anomalies from balloons, satellites, birds, and other clutter, amid national security debates, whistleblower protections, and allegations by David Grusch of a crash‑retrieval program, with current data showing most cases explained but some unresolved.

The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Assessment: A Comprehensive Review of Nomenclature, Observables, Institutional Frameworks, and Strategic Implications - New Space Economy
newspaceeconomy.ca

The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Assessment: A Comprehensive Review of Nomenclature, Observables, Institutional Frameworks, and Strategic Implications - New Space Economy

The study of unidentified objects operating within Earths atmosphere, oceans, and near-space environment has undergone a radical transformation in the early 21st century. For decades, the subject was encapsulated by the term Unidentified Flying Object (UFO), a moniker born in the late 1940s and 1950s that rapidly accumulated a heavy burden of cultural stigma. By the late 1960s, following the conclusion of the United States Air Force’s Project Blue Book, the term UFO had become largely synonymous with science fiction, folklore, and wacko conspiracy theories in the eyes of the scientific establishment. This cultural marginalization had tangible, deleterious effects on national security and aviation safety; pilots, both military and commercial, were frequently discouraged from reporting genuine flight safety hazards due to the fear of professional ridicule or the potential revocation of flight status.